Licensing

Online Gambling Licenses

The licence types operators actually weigh against each other — cost, timeline and what each regulator demands. Figures are indicative and dated; always confirm against the authority's current schedule.

Formal licence document with a wax seal and teal ribbon beside a fountain pen
At a glance

Licence Costs Compared

LicenceAuthorityApplicationAnnualTimeline
Curaçao LOK B2C Licence CGA €4,592 application (non-refundable) €47,450 B2C total (€24,490 National Treasury + €22,960 CGA supervision); domains ANG 500/yr Target ~8 weeks (extendable in 4-week phases)
MGA B2C Gaming Service Licence MGA €5,000 (non-refundable) €25,000 fixed + compliance contribution tiered by GGR 4–6 months
UKGC Remote Casino Operating Licence UKGC Scales with projected Gross Gambling Yield band Scales with GGY band ≈ 16 weeks
Gibraltar B2C Gambling Licence GGD £10,000 per licence type (application) Tiered by GGY per vertical: £50k (≤£20m) / £100k (£20–300m) / £200k (>£300m) Selective — by invitation/track record; several months
Anjouan eGaming Licence anjouan-egaming ≈ US$10,000–25,000 all-in (indicative, varies by agent) Included in package pricing via authorized agents 2–6 weeks
The register

Licence Profiles

LIC-CW-B2C

Curaçao LOK B2C Licence

The successor to the famous master/sub-licence system: since the LOK, all licences are issued directly by the state. The cheapest widely-recognized route to a multi-market offshore operation, at the cost of limited market access in regulated countries.

Key requirements
  • Local representation / registered entity in Curaçao
  • Fit-and-proper checks on UBOs and key persons
  • AML/CFT programme and player-protection policies
  • Annual independent audit and reporting to the GCB
Full profile →
LIC-MT-B2C

MGA B2C Gaming Service Licence

The benchmark EU licence: one licence covering game types 1–4 (casino, fixed-odds betting, P2P poker/betting exchanges, skill games). 5% gaming tax applies only to revenue from players located in Malta.

Key requirements
  • EEA-established company with Malta presence
  • Key-function holders approved by the MGA
  • Player-funds segregation
  • Audited AML/CFT programme; ongoing compliance reviews
Full profile →
LIC-GB-RC

UKGC Remote Casino Operating Licence

The strictest mainstream licence and the only legal route to the British market. Compliance load (affordability, safer-gambling interactions, levy) is the highest of any licence in this registry.

Key requirements
  • Point-of-consumption: required for ANY operator serving GB customers
  • Personal Management Licences for key roles
  • GAMSTOP integration + LCCP social-responsibility code
  • 21% Remote Gaming Duty on GGY
Full profile →
LIC-GI-RG

Gibraltar B2C Gambling Licence

Not an entry-level licence: Gibraltar admits a small set of substantial operators. The Gambling Act 2025 (in force October 1, 2025) replaced the flat £100k fee with GGY-tiered fees and split licensing into B2C, B2B and Support Services categories.

Key requirements
  • Established operator with proven financials
  • Real local presence (staff, infrastructure) in Gibraltar
  • UK-grade compliance expectations
  • Gaming duty 0.15% of GGY (first £100k exempt), paid quarterly
Full profile →
LIC-KM-EG

Anjouan eGaming Licence

The budget offshore licence (Union of the Comoros) that absorbed much of the demand displaced by Curaçao's LOK reform. Fast and cheap, but with minimal supervisory weight — listed here for completeness of the comparison table.

Key requirements
  • Corporate documents + UBO identification
  • Basic AML policy
  • No local presence required
Full profile →

How operators actually choose

The licence decision is a market-access decision wearing a paperwork costume. Point-of-consumption regimes leave no choice: serving British customers means holding a UKGC licence, full stop — the same logic applies in Sweden, Spain, the Netherlands and Ontario. The real choice sits in the unregulated remainder, where Curaçao's reformed LOK licence remains the default and Anjouan absorbs the most price-sensitive demand. Gibraltar plays a different game entirely: a selective club of substantial operators trading higher fees for a near-zero gaming duty and a first-rank reputation.

Costs move accordingly. Cheap licences carry expensive limitations — no access to licensed markets, weaker banking relationships, thinner player trust — while expensive ones amortize across the market access they unlock. The comparison table above states the fees; the country profiles state which markets each licence actually opens.

Reference desk

Licensing, Answered

Which online gambling licence should an operator get?
The honest answer is "whichever markets demand" — point-of-consumption regimes (the UK, Sweden, Spain, the Netherlands) require their own licence regardless of what else an operator holds. Offshore licences (Curaçao, Anjouan) cover the unregulated remainder.
How much does a Curaçao gaming licence cost?
Under the LOK framework: roughly €4,600 to apply (non-refundable) and about €47,000 a year for a B2C licence, split between the National Treasury and the Curaçao Gaming Authority’s supervision fees. It remains the cheapest widely recognized route to multi-market operation.
What is the difference between B2C and B2B licences?
B2C licences authorize serving players; B2B licences authorize supplying games, platforms or services to other operators. Mature regimes license both — Sweden made supplier licences mandatory in 2023, and Gibraltar’s 2025 Act added a Support Services category.
How long does licensing take?
From weeks to half a year: Curaçao targets about eight weeks, Malta typically runs four to six months, a UKGC application around sixteen weeks. Gibraltar is selective rather than slow — admission depends on track record more than paperwork.
Does an MGA licence allow operating across the EU?
Not automatically. There is no EU-wide gambling licence: member states with their own regimes (Spain, Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands...) require local licensing. The MGA licence matters as a credential and covers markets without local frameworks.